Developer guides / Writing a training loop from scratch in JAX

Writing a training loop from scratch in JAX

Author: fchollet
Date created: 2023/06/25
Last modified: 2023/06/25
Description: Writing low-level training & evaluation loops in JAX.

View in Colab GitHub source


Setup

import os

# This guide can only be run with the jax backend.
os.environ["KERAS_BACKEND"] = "jax"

import jax

# We import TF so we can use tf.data.
import tensorflow as tf
import keras
import numpy as np

Introduction

Keras provides default training and evaluation loops, fit() and evaluate(). Their usage is covered in the guide Training & evaluation with the built-in methods.

If you want to customize the learning algorithm of your model while still leveraging the convenience of fit() (for instance, to train a GAN using fit()), you can subclass the Model class and implement your own train_step() method, which is called repeatedly during fit().

Now, if you want very low-level control over training & evaluation, you should write your own training & evaluation loops from scratch. This is what this guide is about.


A first end-to-end example

To write a custom training loop, we need the following ingredients:

  • A model to train, of course.
  • An optimizer. You could either use an optimizer from keras.optimizers, or one from the optax package.
  • A loss function.
  • A dataset. The standard in the JAX ecosystem is to load data via tf.data, so that's what we'll use.

Let's line them up.

First, let's get the model and the MNIST dataset:

def get_model():
    inputs = keras.Input(shape=(784,), name="digits")
    x1 = keras.layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(inputs)
    x2 = keras.layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(x1)
    outputs = keras.layers.Dense(10, name="predictions")(x2)
    model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)
    return model


model = get_model()

# Prepare the training dataset.
batch_size = 32
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = np.reshape(x_train, (-1, 784)).astype("float32")
x_test = np.reshape(x_test, (-1, 784)).astype("float32")
y_train = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_train)
y_test = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_test)

# Reserve 10,000 samples for validation.
x_val = x_train[-10000:]
y_val = y_train[-10000:]
x_train = x_train[:-10000]
y_train = y_train[:-10000]

# Prepare the training dataset.
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_train, y_train))
train_dataset = train_dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=1024).batch(batch_size)

# Prepare the validation dataset.
val_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_val, y_val))
val_dataset = val_dataset.batch(batch_size)

Next, here's the loss function and the optimizer. We'll use a Keras optimizer in this case.

# Instantiate a loss function.
loss_fn = keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)

# Instantiate an optimizer.
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-3)

Getting gradients in JAX

Let's train our model using mini-batch gradient with a custom training loop.

In JAX, gradients are computed via metaprogramming: you call the jax.grad (or jax.value_and_grad on a function in order to create a gradient-computing function for that first function.

So the first thing we need is a function that returns the loss value. That's the function we'll use to generate the gradient function. Something like this:

def compute_loss(x, y):
    ...
    return loss

Once you have such a function, you can compute gradients via metaprogramming as such:

grad_fn = jax.grad(compute_loss)
grads = grad_fn(x, y)

Typically, you don't just want to get the gradient values, you also want to get the loss value. You can do this by using jax.value_and_grad instead of jax.grad:

grad_fn = jax.value_and_grad(compute_loss)
loss, grads = grad_fn(x, y)

JAX computation is purely stateless

In JAX, everything must be a stateless function – so our loss computation function must be stateless as well. That means that all Keras variables (e.g. weight tensors) must be passed as function inputs, and any variable that has been updated during the forward pass must be returned as function output. The function have no side effect.

During the forward pass, the non-trainable variables of a Keras model might get updated. These variables could be, for instance, RNG seed state variables or BatchNormalization statistics. We're going to need to return those. So we need something like this:

def compute_loss_and_updates(trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, y):
    ...
    return loss, non_trainable_variables

Once you have such a function, you can get the gradient function by specifying hax_aux in value_and_grad: it tells JAX that the loss computation function returns more outputs than just the loss. Note that the loss should always be the first output.

grad_fn = jax.value_and_grad(compute_loss_and_updates, has_aux=True)
(loss, non_trainable_variables), grads = grad_fn(
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, y
)

Now that we have established the basics, let's implement this compute_loss_and_updates function. Keras models have a stateless_call method which will come in handy here. It works just like model.__call__, but it requires you to explicitly pass the value of all the variables in the model, and it returns not just the __call__ outputs but also the (potentially updated) non-trainable variables.

def compute_loss_and_updates(trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, y):
    y_pred, non_trainable_variables = model.stateless_call(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x
    )
    loss = loss_fn(y, y_pred)
    return loss, non_trainable_variables

Let's get the gradient function:

grad_fn = jax.value_and_grad(compute_loss_and_updates, has_aux=True)

The training step function

Next, let's implement the end-to-end training step, the function that will both run the forward pass, compute the loss, compute the gradients, but also use the optimizer to update the trainable variables. This function also needs to be stateless, so it will get as input a state tuple that includes every state element we're going to use:

  • trainable_variables and non_trainable_variables: the model's variables.
  • optimizer_variables: the optimizer's state variables, such as momentum accumulators.

To update the trainable variables, we use the optimizer's stateless method stateless_apply. It's equivalent to optimizer.apply(), but it requires always passing trainable_variables and optimizer_variables. It returns both the updated trainable variables and the updated optimizer_variables.

def train_step(state, data):
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = state
    x, y = data
    (loss, non_trainable_variables), grads = grad_fn(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, y
    )
    trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = optimizer.stateless_apply(
        grads, trainable_variables, optimizer_variables
    )
    # Return updated state
    return loss, (
        trainable_variables,
        non_trainable_variables,
        optimizer_variables,
    )

Make it fast with jax.jit

By default, JAX operations run eagerly, just like in TensorFlow eager mode and PyTorch eager mode. And just like TensorFlow eager mode and PyTorch eager mode, it's pretty slow – eager mode is better used as a debugging environment, not as a way to do any actual work. So let's make our train_step fast by compiling it.

When you have a stateless JAX function, you can compile it to XLA via the @jax.jit decorator. It will get traced during its first execution, and in subsequent executions you will be executing the traced graph (this is just like @tf.function(jit_compile=True). Let's try it:

@jax.jit
def train_step(state, data):
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = state
    x, y = data
    (loss, non_trainable_variables), grads = grad_fn(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, y
    )
    trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = optimizer.stateless_apply(
        optimizer_variables, grads, trainable_variables
    )
    # Return updated state
    return loss, (
        trainable_variables,
        non_trainable_variables,
        optimizer_variables,
    )

We're now ready to train our model. The training loop itself is trivial: we just repeatedly call loss, state = train_step(state, data).

Note:

  • We convert the TF tensors yielded by the tf.data.Dataset to NumPy before passing them to our JAX function.
  • All variables must be built beforehand: the model must be built and the optimizer must be built. Since we're using a Functional API model, it's already built, but if it were a subclassed model you'd need to call it on a batch of data to build it.
# Build optimizer variables.
optimizer.build(model.trainable_variables)

trainable_variables = model.trainable_variables
non_trainable_variables = model.non_trainable_variables
optimizer_variables = optimizer.variables
state = trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, optimizer_variables

# Training loop
for step, data in enumerate(train_dataset):
    data = (data[0].numpy(), data[1].numpy())
    loss, state = train_step(state, data)
    # Log every 100 batches.
    if step % 100 == 0:
        print(f"Training loss (for 1 batch) at step {step}: {float(loss):.4f}")
        print(f"Seen so far: {(step + 1) * batch_size} samples")
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 0: 156.4785
Seen so far: 32 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 100: 2.5526
Seen so far: 3232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 200: 1.8922
Seen so far: 6432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 300: 1.2381
Seen so far: 9632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 400: 0.4812
Seen so far: 12832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 500: 2.3339
Seen so far: 16032 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 600: 0.5615
Seen so far: 19232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 700: 0.6471
Seen so far: 22432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 800: 1.6272
Seen so far: 25632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 900: 0.9416
Seen so far: 28832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1000: 0.8152
Seen so far: 32032 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1100: 0.8838
Seen so far: 35232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1200: 0.1278
Seen so far: 38432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1300: 1.9234
Seen so far: 41632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1400: 0.3413
Seen so far: 44832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1500: 0.2429
Seen so far: 48032 samples

A key thing to notice here is that the loop is entirely stateless – the variables attached to the model (model.weights) are never getting updated during the loop. Their new values are only stored in the state tuple. That means that at some point, before saving the model, you should be attaching the new variable values back to the model.

Just call variable.assign(new_value) on each model variable you want to update:

trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = state
for variable, value in zip(model.trainable_variables, trainable_variables):
    variable.assign(value)
for variable, value in zip(model.non_trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables):
    variable.assign(value)

Low-level handling of metrics

Let's add metrics monitoring to this basic training loop.

You can readily reuse built-in Keras metrics (or custom ones you wrote) in such training loops written from scratch. Here's the flow:

  • Instantiate the metric at the start of the loop
  • Include metric_variables in the train_step arguments and compute_loss_and_updates arguments.
  • Call metric.stateless_update_state() in the compute_loss_and_updates function. It's equivalent to update_state() – only stateless.
  • When you need to display the current value of the metric, outside the train_step (in the eager scope), attach the new metric variable values to the metric object and vall metric.result().
  • Call metric.reset_state() when you need to clear the state of the metric (typically at the end of an epoch)

Let's use this knowledge to compute CategoricalAccuracy on training and validation data at the end of training:

# Get a fresh model
model = get_model()

# Instantiate an optimizer to train the model.
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-3)
# Instantiate a loss function.
loss_fn = keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)

# Prepare the metrics.
train_acc_metric = keras.metrics.CategoricalAccuracy()
val_acc_metric = keras.metrics.CategoricalAccuracy()


def compute_loss_and_updates(
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables, x, y
):
    y_pred, non_trainable_variables = model.stateless_call(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x
    )
    loss = loss_fn(y, y_pred)
    metric_variables = train_acc_metric.stateless_update_state(
        metric_variables, y, y_pred
    )
    return loss, (non_trainable_variables, metric_variables)


grad_fn = jax.value_and_grad(compute_loss_and_updates, has_aux=True)


@jax.jit
def train_step(state, data):
    (
        trainable_variables,
        non_trainable_variables,
        optimizer_variables,
        metric_variables,
    ) = state
    x, y = data
    (loss, (non_trainable_variables, metric_variables)), grads = grad_fn(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables, x, y
    )
    trainable_variables, optimizer_variables = optimizer.stateless_apply(
        optimizer_variables, grads, trainable_variables
    )
    # Return updated state
    return loss, (
        trainable_variables,
        non_trainable_variables,
        optimizer_variables,
        metric_variables,
    )

We'll also prepare an evaluation step function:

@jax.jit
def eval_step(state, data):
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables = state
    x, y = data
    y_pred, non_trainable_variables = model.stateless_call(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x
    )
    loss = loss_fn(y, y_pred)
    metric_variables = val_acc_metric.stateless_update_state(
        metric_variables, y, y_pred
    )
    return loss, (
        trainable_variables,
        non_trainable_variables,
        metric_variables,
    )

Here are our loops:

# Build optimizer variables.
optimizer.build(model.trainable_variables)

trainable_variables = model.trainable_variables
non_trainable_variables = model.non_trainable_variables
optimizer_variables = optimizer.variables
metric_variables = train_acc_metric.variables
state = (
    trainable_variables,
    non_trainable_variables,
    optimizer_variables,
    metric_variables,
)

# Training loop
for step, data in enumerate(train_dataset):
    data = (data[0].numpy(), data[1].numpy())
    loss, state = train_step(state, data)
    # Log every 100 batches.
    if step % 100 == 0:
        print(f"Training loss (for 1 batch) at step {step}: {float(loss):.4f}")
        _, _, _, metric_variables = state
        for variable, value in zip(train_acc_metric.variables, metric_variables):
            variable.assign(value)
        print(f"Training accuracy: {train_acc_metric.result()}")
        print(f"Seen so far: {(step + 1) * batch_size} samples")

metric_variables = val_acc_metric.variables
(
    trainable_variables,
    non_trainable_variables,
    optimizer_variables,
    metric_variables,
) = state
state = trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables

# Eval loop
for step, data in enumerate(val_dataset):
    data = (data[0].numpy(), data[1].numpy())
    loss, state = eval_step(state, data)
    # Log every 100 batches.
    if step % 100 == 0:
        print(f"Validation loss (for 1 batch) at step {step}: {float(loss):.4f}")
        _, _, metric_variables = state
        for variable, value in zip(val_acc_metric.variables, metric_variables):
            variable.assign(value)
        print(f"Validation accuracy: {val_acc_metric.result()}")
        print(f"Seen so far: {(step + 1) * batch_size} samples")
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 0: 96.4990
Training accuracy: 0.0625
Seen so far: 32 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 100: 2.0447
Training accuracy: 0.6064356565475464
Seen so far: 3232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 200: 2.0184
Training accuracy: 0.6934079527854919
Seen so far: 6432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 300: 1.9111
Training accuracy: 0.7303779125213623
Seen so far: 9632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 400: 1.8042
Training accuracy: 0.7555330395698547
Seen so far: 12832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 500: 1.2200
Training accuracy: 0.7659056782722473
Seen so far: 16032 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 600: 1.3437
Training accuracy: 0.7793781161308289
Seen so far: 19232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 700: 1.2409
Training accuracy: 0.789318859577179
Seen so far: 22432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 800: 1.6530
Training accuracy: 0.7977527976036072
Seen so far: 25632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 900: 0.4173
Training accuracy: 0.8060488104820251
Seen so far: 28832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1000: 0.5543
Training accuracy: 0.8100025057792664
Seen so far: 32032 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1100: 1.2699
Training accuracy: 0.8160762786865234
Seen so far: 35232 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1200: 1.2621
Training accuracy: 0.8213468194007874
Seen so far: 38432 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1300: 0.8028
Training accuracy: 0.8257350325584412
Seen so far: 41632 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1400: 1.0701
Training accuracy: 0.8298090696334839
Seen so far: 44832 samples
Training loss (for 1 batch) at step 1500: 0.3910
Training accuracy: 0.8336525559425354
Seen so far: 48032 samples
Validation loss (for 1 batch) at step 0: 0.2482
Validation accuracy: 0.835365355014801
Seen so far: 32 samples
Validation loss (for 1 batch) at step 100: 1.1641
Validation accuracy: 0.8388938903808594
Seen so far: 3232 samples
Validation loss (for 1 batch) at step 200: 0.1201
Validation accuracy: 0.8428196907043457
Seen so far: 6432 samples
Validation loss (for 1 batch) at step 300: 0.0755
Validation accuracy: 0.8471122980117798
Seen so far: 9632 samples

Low-level handling of losses tracked by the model

Layers & models recursively track any losses created during the forward pass by layers that call self.add_loss(value). The resulting list of scalar loss values are available via the property model.losses at the end of the forward pass.

If you want to be using these loss components, you should sum them and add them to the main loss in your training step.

Consider this layer, that creates an activity regularization loss:

class ActivityRegularizationLayer(keras.layers.Layer):
    def call(self, inputs):
        self.add_loss(1e-2 * jax.numpy.sum(inputs))
        return inputs

Let's build a really simple model that uses it:

inputs = keras.Input(shape=(784,), name="digits")
x = keras.layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(inputs)
# Insert activity regularization as a layer
x = ActivityRegularizationLayer()(x)
x = keras.layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(x)
outputs = keras.layers.Dense(10, name="predictions")(x)

model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)

Here's what our compute_loss_and_updates function should look like now:

  • Pass return_losses=True to model.stateless_call().
  • Sum the resulting losses and add them to the main loss.
def compute_loss_and_updates(
    trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables, x, y
):
    y_pred, non_trainable_variables, losses = model.stateless_call(
        trainable_variables, non_trainable_variables, x, return_losses=True
    )
    loss = loss_fn(y, y_pred)
    if losses:
        loss += jax.numpy.sum(losses)
    metric_variables = train_acc_metric.stateless_update_state(
        metric_variables, y, y_pred
    )
    return loss, non_trainable_variables, metric_variables

That's it!