Adam
classtf_keras.optimizers.Adam(
learning_rate=0.001,
beta_1=0.9,
beta_2=0.999,
epsilon=1e-07,
adaptive_epsilon=False,
amsgrad=False,
weight_decay=None,
clipnorm=None,
clipvalue=None,
global_clipnorm=None,
use_ema=False,
ema_momentum=0.99,
ema_overwrite_frequency=None,
jit_compile=True,
name="Adam",
**kwargs
)
Optimizer that implements the Adam algorithm.
Adam optimization is a stochastic gradient descent method that is based on adaptive estimation of first-order and second-order moments.
According to Kingma et al., 2014, the method is "computationally efficient, has little memory requirement, invariant to diagonal rescaling of gradients, and is well suited for problems that are large in terms of data/parameters".
Arguments
tf.Tensor
, floating point value, a schedule that is a
tf.keras.optimizers.schedules.LearningRateSchedule
, or a callable
that takes no arguments and returns the actual value to use. The
learning rate. Defaults to 0.001
.
beta_1: A float value or a constant float tensor, or a callable
that takes no arguments and returns the actual value to use. The
exponential decay rate for the 1st moment estimates.
Defaults to 0.9
.
beta_2: A float value or a constant float tensor, or a callable
that takes no arguments and returns the actual value to use. The
exponential decay rate for the 2nd moment estimates.
Defaults to 0.999
.
epsilon: A small constant for numerical stability. This epsilon is
"epsilon hat" in the Kingma and Ba paper (in the formula just before
Section 2.1) if adaptive_epsilon
is False
, not the epsilon in
Algorithm 1 of the paper. Defaults to 1e-7
.
adaptive_epsilon: If True
the epsilon hat is computed adaptively
from the given epsilon (Algorithm 1 on the paper). If False
, the
epsilon given will be "epsilon hat". Default to False
.
amsgrad: Boolean. Whether to apply AMSGrad variant of this algorithm
from the paper "On the Convergence of Adam and beyond".
Defaults to False
.
name: String. The name to use
for momentum accumulator weights created by
the optimizer.use_ema=True
.
This is the momentum to use when computing
the EMA of the model's weights:
new_average = ema_momentum * old_average + (1 - ema_momentum) *
current_variable_value
.use_ema=True
. Every ema_overwrite_frequency
steps of iterations,
we overwrite the model variable by its moving average.
If None, the optimizer
does not overwrite model variables in the middle of training, and you
need to explicitly overwrite the variables at the end of training
by calling optimizer.finalize_variable_values()
(which updates the model
variables in-place). When using the built-in fit()
training loop,
this happens automatically after the last epoch,
and you don't need to do anything.tf.experimental.dtensor.Mesh
instance. When provided,
the optimizer will be run in DTensor mode, e.g. state
tracking variable will be a DVariable, and aggregation/reduction will
happen in the global DTensor context.Reference
amsgrad
.Notes:
The default value of 1e-7 for epsilon might not be a good default in general. For example, when training an Inception network on ImageNet a current good choice is 1.0 or 0.1. Note that since Adam uses the formulation just before Section 2.1 of the Kingma and Ba paper rather than the formulation in Algorithm 1, the "epsilon" referred to here is "epsilon hat" in the paper.
The sparse implementation of this algorithm (used when the gradient is an
IndexedSlices object, typically because of tf.gather
or an embedding
lookup in the forward pass) does apply momentum to variable slices even if
they were not used in the forward pass (meaning they have a gradient equal
to zero). Momentum decay (beta1) is also applied to the entire momentum
accumulator. This means that the sparse behavior is equivalent to the dense
behavior (in contrast to some momentum implementations which ignore momentum
unless a variable slice was actually used).